 |
Reptile Forum, Reptile Classifieds - CaptiveBred A site to share your Reptile experiances & ask questions
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sean CaptiveBred Addict!
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 602
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dave you are obviously intent on provocation and seem to have nothing else better to do with your time.
Yes you are correct it is "flaw" but don't worry that's not going to discredited me because of your pettiness it just make you look an OZ'ole
Yes I do think it is possible inbreeding could have an effect on the out come off embryo's dying during incubation and eggs going full term and not hatching if there was something wrong with the founder stock to begin with.
End of discussion |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sam Sweet Contributing Member
Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Way to go, Sean -- you were dead wrong in criticizing Dave's comments, he pointed that out, you don't acknowledge it and instead call him a few names. That's what we call being a churl, don't we now.
I'll repeat the point for you -- "inbreeding" cannot be the cause of incremental decline in reproductive success in repeated matings of the same pair, because the first clutch is F1 and the 12th clutch is still F1. It is quite rare among lab, livestock or pet animals to see significant inbreeding depression crop up in line-bred lineages at less than F8-10. What herp keepers are seeing is "husbandry depression", not inbreeding depression. Given the continued smuggling of Australian monitors, I really doubt that you could find any individuals even of V. acanthurus that are more than F3-4 line-bred, with no outcrossing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sean CaptiveBred Addict!
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Posts: 602
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Off course it can, if you take 2 F1 animals that have genetic flaws to begin with these will surely pass on to possibly some of the offspring through the genes they inherit from their parents and ancestors.
What I am saying and clearly Arborgoanna points out that surely nothing good can result in inbreeding generation after generation in the long term unless reptiles have found away to over come this.
Your forgetting that those glauerti for example that keeping producing "bad" eggs to coin it in a nutshell have come from all the same lineage. I am not saying it is the same but when the royal families years ago repeatedly married inwards and had children many were weak and sick and so died or suffered chronic illnesses because of inbreeding depression. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crocdoc Key Member
Joined: 07 Dec 2005 Posts: 262 Location: Sydney Australia - best address on Earth :)
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sean wrote: | Dave you are obviously intent on provocation and seem to have nothing else better to do with your time. |
Are you serious? First you create some straw man argument, falsely claiming what was said in that discussion about inbreeding, then you make a smart arse crack about 'akerdemics', and now YOU accuse ME of being intent on provocation? Sean wrote: | I remember your clik saying something on this forum about inbreeding is not a factor in reptiles as it can be in mammals. If I remember rightly it was about incubation and certain odartria sp dying before 6 months of age or going full term and not hatching.
Now what, you are obvoiusly agreeing with me. hmmmmmmmmmm some u-turn maybe you read it in a journel thats what Akedemics do like you.
Tunnel vision if its not on paper then it is not fact. |
Then you completely ignore my comments about what that inbreeding discussion was actually about and go for a bit of name calling. Onya.
Sean wrote: | Yes I do think it is possible inbreeding could have an effect on the out come off embryo's dying during incubation and eggs going full term and not hatching if there was something wrong with the founder stock to begin with.
End of discussion |
No, the end of that discussion happened ages ago in another thread but it seems you still aren't getting it. The scenario we were talking about was pairs of monitors that had been bred and produced perfectly good clutches, then on consecutive breedings with the same pair fewer and fewer eggs hatched out of each clutch. The argument wasn't whether or not inbreeding was an issue in monitors in general, but whether or not inbreeding could explain the failed clutches in those instances. Since the pairs in question produced perfectly good clutches the first time around, how could the same animals become more inbred before producing later clutches? They were either inbred to start with and producing patchy, weak or inviable clutches from day one, or they weren't.
I can't believe I'm wasting time trying to explain this again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MJ Site Moderator

Joined: 26 May 2006 Posts: 5738 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yet again lads....
Interesting discussion but keep it on topic and keep the personal attack off the forum please. _________________ Paul
For all your Tropical plant and Naturalistic Vivarium needs please enjoy Urban Bromeliad |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|